tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20145082.post3590835924500603397..comments2023-09-07T03:37:40.566-05:00Comments on Eye on Wisconsin: A Scary Primer on the 60-Plus AssociationCory Liebmannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08471921047425833760noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20145082.post-40342081630533737512012-06-08T06:03:26.721-05:002012-06-08T06:03:26.721-05:00Three questions into these surveys provide enough ...Three questions into these surveys provide enough awareness that these arent surveys but simply a self-serving way of saying you support their platform or position. ARGH! It's disturbing that Sixty-plus is headed by former appointee of George W. These groups have lead people who at first glance don't appear to have deep political connections while posing to be a watch dog for public Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20145082.post-62114778566560704922012-06-05T17:19:48.660-05:002012-06-05T17:19:48.660-05:00Pete says, 60+ just got of the phone with me. Typi...Pete says, 60+ just got of the phone with me. Typical slanted questions and even more slanted choices. I have been amazed by the guts these people have, thinking that their surveys are to be considered valid. True Rovian politics! Anyone not on to their game can be tricked into giving them the answers they need to hear. Just like the spoiled athlete. Pat me on the back and tell me how Great I am.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20145082.post-33221021148447079812011-05-13T17:20:36.085-05:002011-05-13T17:20:36.085-05:00kevinN - if I remember correctly, big pharma was p...kevinN - if I remember correctly, big pharma was publicly supporting the affordable care act and privately funding astroturfing organizations to oppose it. I'm not going to look into it, but I wouldn't be surprised to hear that 60 plus was one of those organizations.Patnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20145082.post-24313304175033847152010-10-15T10:12:08.228-05:002010-10-15T10:12:08.228-05:00Thanks for your posting on 60 Plus. The Annenburg...Thanks for your posting on 60 Plus. The Annenburg Center wrote on their site that there's no factual support to the claim that Big Pharma is currently behind 60 Plus, not since 2003. Annenberg wrote:" Furthermore, the prescription-drug lobby and 60 Plus were on opposite sides during the debate over the new health care law." Can you comment on this or direct me further?kevinNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09831352348714262950noreply@blogger.com