Friday, June 15, 2012

Call for Recount is Clearly Coordinated Hypocrisy

You could see this coming a mile away.  Outgoing Republican State Senator Van Wanggaard at the 11th hour is requesting a recount.  The Republican front groups have been clearly setting the table for this with their anonymous allegations of alleged "voter fraud".  So it was no surprise that Wanggaard and his Republican Party handlers are using this carefully crafted pretext as their excuse for a frivolous recount.  Willfully smearing the vote and the voters in the one race that they lost on June 5th was the only option without looking like sore losers (FAIL).

Let's run through how this has played out shall we?
  1. The same right wingers that complained about "out-of-state" influences now brag about the out-of-state people and organizations that they brought in to try and suppress the vote in Democratic leaning areas of this district.  Apparently that suppression effort included a municipal clerk from Illinois
  2. Although many Walker worshipers were ungracious winners on election night, they also proved to be sore losers in Wanggaard's lost recall election.  They quickly started the typical allegations about imaginary "voter fraud".  
  3. After the official numbers showed that Wanggaard actually lost by more votes than initially reported, he stalled about whether he would call for a frivolous recount.  
  4. Anonymous reports conveniently show up the day before Wanggaard's deadline to request a recount. They are amplified by the typical Republican front groups and their loyal media outlets. 
  5. Magically Wanggaard announces at the 11th hour that he is requesting a frivolous recount and he and his party handlers use the pretext of anonymously reported and still unverified "voter fraud" as the reason. 
Another aspect that is so completely telling is the stark hypocrisy of it all.
  1. Republicans complained endlessly about the recall process (even though they have encouraged it in years past) but now they are essentially declaring their desire to continue that process because they lost a senate seat. 
  2. Republicans complained endlessly about "wasting taxpayer dollars" with recall elections but then proceeded to run fake Democrats and now they are willing to waste more taxpayer time and resources with a frivolous recount simply because they lost a senate seat.
  3. Does anyone remember the Republican complaints about the recount in the historically close state supreme court race last year? 
Here are a few selected items on the prospect of a Kloppenburg recount when the margin of victory was 0.5% or less and qualified for a paid recount (btw, Wanggaard's is not close enough to qualify):
I could go on all day with this Republican recount hypocrisy but you get the point.

In the end we are witnessing a clearly coordinated effort to manufacture a crisis and to drag out the same recall battle that Republicans claimed to hate (before they lost the state senate).  Shameless.

5 comments:

Democurmudgeon said...

Nicely researched and framed. Of course, Republicans will deny it.

Pessimist said...

One has to wonder if Walker and his thugs have something up their sleeves..

They delay for a reason. What might that be?

Anonymous said...

I don't think it's necessary either. That said, where were you when Kloppenburg called for a recount? Cheering with the rest? He wanted it despite those on his own side stating otherwise. The only hypocrisy from the right is on Wang. On the left, it's the entire party.

Cory Liebmann said...

Kloppenburg was down less than 0.5% and as such she qualified for a state paid recount. She took advantage of it as was her right.

Van Wanggaard lost by more than 1% so he did not qualify for a fully paid recount.

By that measure she at least had a case...he does not.

Anonymous said...

"Kloppenburg was down less than 0.5% and as such she qualified for a state paid recount. She took advantage of it as was her right.
Van Wanggaard lost by more than 1% so he did not qualify for a fully paid recount.
By that measure she at least had a case...he does not."
Actually, under the law, it's his right as well. He followed the law just as Klop did.
The hypocrisy of the left still stands.